Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Cassidy's avatar

Utterly bizarre time to announce the departure of Dan Ashworth, on the weekend the club was celebrating the life of a wonderful club servant, Kath Phipps. May she rest in peace.

I’m not sure marginal gains are up and running here. Perhaps margarine gains would be more appropriate.

Whether the ousting of Ashworth is justified or not, I don’t know, but the optics for the club aren’t flattering. The club continues to lurch from issue to issue.

One of the justifications cited in the press was Ratcliffe’s apparent fury over Ashworth voicing his support for Ten Hag in the media. What was he supposed to do?

For years we have been told the footballing structure at MUFC isn’t right, so yes, it may have been slightly top heavy with the appointment of Ashworth & Wilcox*, however, considering the club’s lack of maturity in this regard, more credible football people is better than less.

*My own opinion on this is the new minority owners didn’t understand the background of each man, and what they were supposed to be doing. Ashworth more strategic and operational than hands on recruitment than is commonly (mis) understood.

Expand full comment
Adrian Myer's avatar

As a Blue, one is delighted with the way things are going presently - but it isn't all own to Maresca's management and Cole Palmer's brilliance, not by a long chalk. Other factors are involved, often unseen by many.

On Sunday I watched until Curlilocks fell over for the first time. I sighed wearily, took stock, then turned over and watched the cricket. And we won both games. People simply do not realise that it’s the likes of me that are responsible for CFC’s upturn in fortunes. Subtle but decisive use of the remote is all.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts